the new york times editorial — again. the new york times editorial board _ again. times | editorial board came out the chicago tribune, various columnists, christophe, thomas friedman. david ignatius, use or evenjoe scarborough of or even joe scarborough of morning joe or evenjoe scarborough of morning joe frame who the president does pay attention to. a very watched programme. his very—watched programme, you know, came out saying — asking questions about where do we go from here? how does this go on? his co—host and wife was not on the same page. so, we'll see. i mean, i think that — but i do think that this is going to be hard to have — you know, when the hur report came out, there was conversation from the vice president that this was politically motivated. when the viral clips came out of the president on d—day and otherwise, we were told, "0h, these are," you know, "these are modified clips." they were cropped, they were cropped differently. certainly, there were claims made by the rnc and others that were not true around those clips. but at the end of the day

again, your -- your response to that reporting in "the new york times" where the president -- i have to say it's funny when you read it. it might be getting overinterpreted exactly what those people were saying to "the new york times," but i want to, again, get your response to it. >> first of all, lawrence, thank you for having me on. it's always a pleasure. it's unequivocally false. the president has said himself he's in this election. he met with democratic governors today he's in it to win this election. the president told our staff today at campaign headquarters that he is in it to win it. so that is where joe biden is. that remains unchanged since before the debate to now, and we're going to continue to do everything we can to make sure we're building the campaign and apparatus that is going to win this election, because make no mistake about it, the campaign that performed is going to win this election, and that is exactly what our campaign has been doing since april when the campaign announced re-election. >> i think we have to talk about it now on a day by day basis because h

and again from "the new york times," less the basic contours of the race change, and i am quoting "theew york times" here, and some of the sun belt battleground states become more competitive, which is unlikely, biden's only path to winning is to carry michigan, that's why he is there tonight, pennsylvania, and wisconsin. now guys, this is a very heavy lift, joe biden is down as much as five points in pennsylvania and wisconsin, and he is even slightly down in michigan. this is a devastating piece in the times tonight, joining me now, strategist and pollster justin wallin, justin, this was something. we had like multiple full screens. i don't usually do that, but i wanted to be very clear about what we were laying out tonight, these -- this is the great disappearing path to victory for joe biden. and this is "the new "the new york times." >> it's astonishing. the impact of that debate continues to roll and roll and roll, and you noted a number of different distinct shifts and changes in the contours of the race where we were only to look at where we are traditionally seen as the centoc

because it has been a big hour with "the new york times" reported that president biden has spoken to a key ally about possibly dropping out of the rates although saying he's still in the fight news breakint by moment the white house denying it will bring it this morning i'll be guest hosting for laura ingraham the governors going to the white house but democratic governors going to the white house, are they there to assess the damage? or are they there to support the president? we will bring you the answers tonight. over to "america reports." >> cheap fakes, misinformation, disinformation, do you have any regret over using that language? >> not at all. >> is a the governors just want a direct and candid conversation with the president. we want to make sure he is doing okay. >> independent mainstream fact-checkers in the press and misinformation experts have been calling out cheap fakes. at the end of the day they are fakes. >> there is an unhealthy conversation that will happen with the president. i hope he'll be expressing what he intends to go forward with in the campaign and they a

white house spokesman andrew bates posted this on "the new york times" report. we have to get this out here. he quotes that claim is absolutely false. if "the new york times" had provided us with more than seven minutes to comment, we would have told them so. that's very interesting. doug, it doesn't seem to me that it would be so farfetched for a private conversation to be held. would it indicate necessarily that biden is actually considering stepping aside, maybe not. i'm sure the conversation has been had. somebody had to have had this conversation with biden since debate. >> i would be startled, if the conversation did not happen. i would be startled if there were not multiple conversations with joe biden and with the key staffers around him. look, what david said about the swing state polling is now evident in what i've seen and most observers have seen. states that were in play -- not in play are now in play and the seven swing states all show comfortable leads. if that continues, it will be impossible in my judgment for joe biden to stay in the race politi

and -- >> george: "new york times" and nbc both have you about 6 points behind in the popular vote. >> that's exactly right. "new york times" had me behind before and didn't have anything to do with this race. behind 10 points. 10 points, they had me behind. nothing's changed substantially

democracy we are and how they should be like us when they choose their leaders this is done by the new york times. i remember the new york times is not a fan of the democrats. i mean is a fan of the democrats and it's interesting. they tend to be more to the left. so here they are. they asked all the writers at the new york times, who do you think has the best chance of beating trump? who do you think it's a strong as candidate? this is before she was right about the time she was made. look at her picture there on the left compared to all the other candidates. she is the whiskey as choice as the president united states. that the only reason i'm putting that up is that's the new york times saying this roemer. uh not us. but i think it goes to the point right as to whether she's really the people's choice or not. and it seems to me that she's not. so given that scenario, given the fact that she had a horrible race in 2020, given the fact that people really didn't vote for her the motor for joe biden. i mean, can we go around the world saying, look out the matter how democratic we are in this choice

all this time on my hands and i've always you know, there's always this delicate dance with the new york times where you for a book leave and they shudder and say, oh, you know, how can we let somebody out on a book leave? and so this time i didn't have to ask anybody for book leave and it was just tailor made. well, thank you for being here as. a i don't have you would have made a very great governor. i will say, you know, i want to jump to current events right now are tied to to to your memoir you have column in today's new york times and it is about gaza and the middle east and is an area and a subject matter that you know extremely well having traveled to that region extensively and, i'm going to quote from today's column. you it may not be in netanyahu's to flatten rafah because anything that prolongs the war keeps him in office. but it's not in israel's interest. and then later on it says, i think this is from your book, pay attention not only to the number of fighters you kill, but also the number you create. so can you talk about the the incident, the activity that's happening right no

an extraordinary story in today's "new york times," as well as new reporting that says president bidend a key ally he knows he may not be able to salvage his candidacy. the white house says, this is false. that said, what can you tell us about the conversation the president is having as well as extensive reporting in "the new york times" today, peter, about the president's lapses during his trips to france, to italy, and other meetings? >> yeah. the story from my colleague this morning on the president's conversation with his ally is an issue we have had that he is actively considering whether he might not be able to stay in the race. he still sounds determined to try to fight it out. recognizes things are not going well. the next few days will be critical, particularly the interview with george stephanopoulos. he recognizes if he doesn't do well in that interview in particular it will be hard to save the campaign at that point. doesn't mean he is dropping out. the fact he is willing to broach that tells us there's a shift. the people i talked to say it feels more pessimistic today tha

she didn't give the answer the new york times wanted or other reporters wanted. but she did, in fact, answer every single time the reporters kept banging on about a new york times report today that indicated that a neurologist had visited the white house eight times in the last year. here is the full explanation of how that has nothing to do with president biden and president biden's health and the kind of out-of-control behavior by the white house, most of the white house press corps and not all. most of the white house press corps today was as bad a circus as it looked like. the presidents a physician, kevin o'connor, has publicly released a memo that is directed to karine jean-pierre, basically in response to what she had to go through today in the white house press briefing. it does explain, in more detail, something that karine jean-pierre explained today, which is the white house medical unit doesn't treat just the president. many white house staffers are treated by the medical unit and some cabinet members and over 1000 members of the military are serviced

and this is "the new york ti "the new york times." >> it's astonishing. impact of that debate continues to roll and roll and roll, and you noted a number of different distinct shifts and changes in the contours of the race where we were only to look at where we are traditionally seen as the centocor battleground states, now donald trump has a lead outside of the margin of error, so significantly need in five of those seven, which means that he wins. so if we were just going to look at the three states that he has to win in that scenario described in "the new york times," he is losing in at least one of those spy beyond the margin of error of just north of five points, this is just disastrous for the campaign. if the election were held today, it is very, very difficult to say with any credibility that anyone other than former president trump what emerged victorious. >> laura: , so joe biden must win michigan, no doubt about it, he has to win michigan, and tonight the very popular, she's one of the most popular governors in the united states, gretchen whitm

three, instead of the eight times in eight months reported that the new york times delivered and was breathlessly accepted by the white house press corps. that was easily available information to the new york times, the president's travel schedule, and they did not bother to even think about it, look at it, or report it. not one person working at the new york times from the publisher, editor on down to those reporters, not did it ever cross their minds, where was president biden on that day? where was he in the world? never crossed their minds. that is college newspaper standard. that we're talking about, here. president biden wasn't there most of the time when the neurologist visited the white house. president's travel schedule is even more public than the white house visitor logs, you have the president's travel schedule, the new york times did not bother to check the presidents travel schedule before suggesting to the world that a neurologist visited the white house eight times in eight months presumably to treat patient biden. that was a very bad piece of reporting by our best new

andrew bates tweeted that claimed by "the new york times" is absolutely false. "the new york times" had provided us with 7 minutes to comment, we would have told him so. you played the campaign denying this on the airwaves. we've heard from a couple of folks. this is a big piece of news this morning. the major piece of news which speaks to the landscape he is facing is this report that 25 house democrats are preparing calls for the president to step aside if he has a shaky performance over the next few days. we are going to see the president at a medal of honor ceremony. prepared remarks with no indication he will take any questions from the press. it will be an opportunity to field questions of what is normally a teleprompter event. we are also going to see him meeting with democratic governors who had been asking for a meeting with him just to make sure that he is okay. listen to what andy said. >> i think the governors want a direct and candid conversation with the president. we want to make sure he is doing okay. we know him. he has formed a personal relatio

i would just like to add one thing which i think is important, which is for my career at the new york timesamed larry karpman. fabulousjournalist. he's now writing a book on the timely topic of presidential health. but every campaign — like, way before election day, before the conventions — he would do a sit—down interview with the presidential candidates and ask for access to their health records. and over the years, there were various levels of cooperation... ..from total cooperation to none. but, you know, larry's long gone from the times, unfortunately, and no—one has really stepped into that role since then, which i think is a great pity, a real kind of hole in american journalism. well, we're going to move off politics now and talk about something maybe a little bit more fun, because it was the glastonbury festival last weekend. 210,000 people in a series of fields on what is usually a working farm in south—west england, and a festival that, well, ros, you were at because ros happened to be djing there. mc: ros atkins! drum and bass version of bbc news theme plays harder, faster, larg

i would not be surprised it was a "new york times" e editorial, it is a "new york times" news story. s that is not fit to print, was written by reporters -- bureau chief are in "new york times." just saying, there is a small group connected with minority control of the economy, that is called the corrupt -- run by a close circle of friends of president maduro. all right, sorry "new york times." had to do it news story. really? more economic goofiness, fed meets today and tomorrow, to figure out monetary policy, always about interest rates or labor markets or gdp . however, former governor kevin warsh deserves kudos for his "wall street journal" op-ed yesterday, he was on this show last evening. he wrotes high priest of central bank dogma might consider is blasphemy, monetary policy has something to do with money. imagine. practice ofo mr. warsh. he points out that fed's balance sheet remains near record highs. since money has something to do with inflation, progress on inflation lately may knnot be sustain able because of the fed's balance sheet, and mr. warsh might have added they sh

think they should go to a coffee shop and there used to be one across the street, pick up a "new york times times" internal polling from biden super pac that shows trump winning new mexico, shows him winning new hampshire, shows him winning virginia. at these are states that biden won by double digits. is this false confidence? up and they really believe this? >> i think this is continual lies, also new jersey bureau there is not one state president trump won that seems in trouble. he has actually added and stronger. that is why is every hour goes forward, there will be another democrat elected in congress to come out again biden. this did not help biden bringing the governor's but not the eight tier candidates out there to rally behind him. and even these who rally behind him weren't, they were pointing out his negatives. >> kayleigh: speaker mccarthy, thank you very much. here to rick fox news contributor, raymond arroyo. governor, is he hiding behind the white house podium and is he doing that odd thing where he shows people where the white house pool used to be and where are they? >> lo

imagine how long the new york times editorial would be if joe biden never said that about electric planes were sharks and electrocution. the new york times editorial board has not been moved to say a single thing about the madness of donald trump that actually comes out of his mouth. politics isn't fair, so that's the way it goes. politics has never been fair, it never will be fair and i'm not trying to make it fair right now, because it isn't. joe biden knows that. joe biden knows that he is always going to be judged at a much higher standard than donald trump, who has manifestly been the laziest president, who by all accounts did not emerge from the residence in the white house until 11:00 a.m., but no one in the white house press corps ever pressed a trump white house press secretary about that. >> reporter: what does the president do outside the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.? >> well, you heard him speak to supporters yesterday outside of 4:00 vm. you saw the president landed north carolina in the middle of the night at 2:00. what was he doing? he was greeting supporters, hundreds

pick up the "new york times." >> the "new york times" has internal polling from a biden super pac thatwinning new mexico. shows him winning new hampshire. shows him winning virginia. these are states that biden won by double digits. so, is this just false confidence? i mean, how can they really believe this? >> i think this is just continual lies. also new jersey. there is not one state that president trump won last time that troubling in. he is actually added and even stronger. that's why every hour goes forward, there will be another democrat elected in congress to come out against biden. this did not help biden bringing all the governors in but not putting the a tier candidates out there to go rally behind him. and even these who rally behind him weren't. they were pointing out his negatives. >> kayleigh: speaker mccarthy. thanks very much. >> thank you. >> kayleigh: here to react is fox news contributor raymond arroyo. governor -- hiding behind the white house podium? is biden doing that odd thing where he like shows people where the white house pool used to be in the middle of the

even before he spoke. >> i had a bad night. >> you heard biden there mentioning pulling from the new york timesusting he gained a point but biden hasn't made great strides in pulling who is telling him this he didn't gain a single-point instead of losing 3 in the new york times see a pull. trump leads of voters 49-43 the largest lead trump has had since 2015. and then biden was asked directly whether he'd be willing to take a cognitive exam here's what he had to stated that. >> would you undergo a independent medical evaluation to do that and then release the results to the american people? >> ev a cognitive test every single day i've had tests everything i do not only my campaigning on running the world that sounds like hyperbole. >> he was asked from front times whether he would take that. 4 times he deflected the interview was also an opportunity for him to lay out a vision for a second term for the american people unable to do that so far given a chance tonight but it fell flat. >> this next term we will straighten out the tax system in a situation where we have healthcare for all people in

another "new york times" "new york times" headline biden's circle shrinks as democrats fear election wipeout. brett, this was nikki haley's big speech last night, some of it. >> i will start by making one thing perfectly clear. donald trump has my strong endorsement, period. we should acknowledge that there are some americans who don't agree with donald trump at 100 of the time. you don't have to agree with trump 100% of the time to vote for him. >> sandra: how far did her message go with swaying some voters who might just say they aren't ready to vote for donald trump? >> sandra: yes, well we don't know that yet. i think we will see a lot more in polls coming up. we haven't really seen all of the polling that has happened since obviously the assassination attempt on saturday we will probably not have that for a another week or two but i do think that message was well received in the whole. obviously the former president went into the convention hall early to sit there and listen to that speech. and also governor of florida ron desantis' speech which was also well received. and its p

they were written up in the new york times when their their colonel came to new york on a vacation. he was he was lauded for bravery. the times they appeared in the cincinnati papers they appeared in the california papers. it makes it they not to put too fine point on it at center stage associated with the most famous generals on the union side in the final act of the civil war. if the civil war were was depicted the opera they would have been on stage in the chorus at every point. you mentioned ken burns, which brings to the third strand of the book, which is the complaint, if you like, the criticism of the cause myth anthology. there are two characters who play a big part in the book. one is william archibald dunning, whom you call a lion of manhattan society. and another was walter fleming. can tell us about those two guys. i can. these are the architects of the lost mythology. and it's so fitting that we're here in new jersey. we'll turn to dunning first. william archibald dunning was born in plainfield, new jersey. he went to princeton, kicked out. he went to columbia, got his p

democracy we are and how they should be like us when they choose their leaders this is done by the new york times, and i remember the new york times is not a fan of the democrats. i mean is a fan of the democrats and it's interesting. they tend to be more to the left. so here they are, they asked all the writers at the new york times, who do you think has the best chance of beating trump? who do you think it's a strong as candidate? this is before she was right about the time she was made, look at her picture there on the left compared to all the other candidates. she is the whiskey as choice as the president united states. now the only reason i'm putting that up is that's the new york times saying this roemer. uh not us. but i think it goes to the point right. as to whether she's really the people's choice or not. and it seems to me that she's not. so given that scenario, given the fact that she had a horrible race in 2020, given the fact that people really didn't vote for her the motor for joe biden. i mean, can we go around the world saying, look out the matter how democratic we are in this ch

. >> carley: new"new york times" opedclaim the first amendment is out of control. "new york times" said that? really? >> lawrence: morones. >> brian: nathan's hot dog eating contest is tomorrow and joey chestnut won't be there, where he'll be instead. >> steve: are they replacing joe, joey chestnut with biden? he's a hot dog. final hour of "fox and friends" starts now. remember, mornings are betters with friends. >> brian: house democrats preparing to call for president biden to end his reelection effort. >> lawrence: comes as pair of congressional democrats publicly declare they have no confidence in biden's ability to win and serve another term. >> steve: mr. doug luzader is live in washington with details of the mutiny of the biden. >> doug: good morning. the president will be under a microscope and no one may be examining him more closely than this group of house democrats. this is what reuters is reporting, there are 25 democratic members of house of representative preparing to call for biden to step aside if he seems shaky in coming days, according to one demo

sorry this "new york times" author. e country and you will see them on the show talking about patriotism. we have done it before together. it's a great time, right, guys? >> joey: yeah, absolutely. i hate it for the "new york times" opinion editorial board but we're going to show a lot of fireworks. >> aishah: we're going to eat a lot of hot dogs too, carley. >> carley: yes! >> lawrence: share some american stories, too. >> aishah: so many amazing incredible stories and heros to talk about. all looking forward to doing it with you. i want to say i don't know who picked us to be together, but they picked like four best friends. so i'm just excited. i haven't seen you guys in like months in person. so super excited. >> lawrence: a family reunion. >> carley: i remember last year aishah we spent so much of our prep time like gabbing in my office. we have a show to do. so i can't wait to see you, joey, great to see you right over there. can i see you in my line of vision. i shall see you in person tomorrow. give you all a big

so just like the bbc the new york times which is a giant american daily. um, it's facing criticism for its coverage, its headline about an israeli attack a school in gaza, the new york times used a passive voice without specifying who carried out the attack, yeah, we have seen this uh consistently over the years, not just since 7 october, so in contrast, the news article detailing russia's assault a children's hospital in ukraine explicitly attributed the attack to russia, and employed emotionally charged language, including the term deadly. yeah, however, the nyt updated its headline on the gaza attack in response to the reaction, this time using the phrase israeli attack in its headline, which is a first, well not a first, but it's rare, it's rare to even attribute the strike to anyone. also, the nyt in a recent article that was published after the israeli massacre on the gaza school compound during the first week of july, published a piece by raja abdul rahim and thomas fuller, which was called carnage at gaza school compound adds to mounting death tall at un buildings. now let's st

you have to wonder, someone is delivering this to "the new york times." their opinion clear. they want biden gone. you have to wonder, where is it coming from. kamala harris is not at high tea pretending and watching some reality tv. she's involved. she is favored by barack obama. she's always -- he has always liked her. that could be what's happening internally. he remains chaotic. at the same time i don't think this is going to result well with the american people. they voted for biden. there's too much money at stake. this could be a fiduciary thing they need to do because there's hundreds of millions of dollars at stake but i don't think ultimately in the end that this is going to work and the american people are going to say oh, thank god. she has been involved in this catastrophe and i you see it's like a switch out. that's not how democracy works, is it? >> kayleigh: "the new york times" say the survey of kamala at the top the ticket vis-a-vis trump is being conducted this week, commissioned by the biden campaigns analytics team and is believed to b

this interview, according to the "new york times", came about on tuesday. this was when the communications director texted george stephanopoulos and said, hey, let's get this going. what's curious to me is that is more than a week after the debate, what happened on tuesday? well, there were a series of stories that broke. here are the headlines. "new york times" biden tells allies he knows he only has days to salvage his candidacy. you'll see several others that are pulled up about lord lloyd. lloyd doggett, excuse saying that he's withdrawing support from the president. finally, playbook pm sayingn thi the dam breaks on biden. top democrats, pelosi, clyburn saying biden's age. >> our concern the dam began to break and then the interview came about. >> so this was about stopping the bleeding. and i'm curious if it worked and why did they wait this longg to arrange it? that's the thing. eight days after that debate and, you don't do a live interview just to show people that it's. okay. and oh, by the way, that wasn't live. abc, for whatever reason, sodecided

the new york times front page story this morning about the president, angling to make time his best ally. every day that mr. biden defies pressure to step aside, the prospects and logistics of replacing him become more untenable. and the potential of weeks of democratic infighting as the united republican party nominates donald trump may start to look worse than rallying behind mr. biden. no matter the concerns about the 81-year-old president's health and ability to defeat mr. trump. the new york times this morning says the prent's strategy is to run out the clock. karl rove, a republican strategist, writes in the opinion pages of the wall street journal what biden's exit could do for democrats. he says all but 43 of the convention delegates -- the chicago gathering will not be a bunch of bernie brose. it will be mostly normal democrats who want to win the election. if no candidate gets a first ballot majority when the regular delegates vote, the democratic so-called superdelegates can vote. talk about a crew of practical politicos focus on victory. we will be glued to our screens the en

but wait a second, it's actually a "new york times" news story. that's right, news story. this news that is not fit to print was written by reporters frances robles and bureau chief for "the new york times," julie turkewitz. just saying, there is a small group connected with minority control of the economy. that's called the corrupt nomenclatura, run by close circle of friends of president maduro. sorry "new york times," had to do it, news story, really? more economic goofiness, the fed middle easts today and tomorrow to figure out monetary policy and it is always about interest rates or labor markets or gdp. however former governor kevin warsh deserves kudos for his "wall street journal" op-ed yesterday and he was on this show last evening. kevin warsh writes, the high priest of central bank dogma might consider it blasphemy but monetary policy has, wait for it, something to do with money. imagine, bravo, mr. warsh. he points out that the fed's balance sheet remains at record highs. since money has something to do with inflation, the progress on inflation lately may not be

they were written up in the new york times when their their colonel came to new york on a vacation. he was he was lauded for bravery. the times they appeared in the cincinnati papers they appeared in the california papers. it makes it they not to put too fine point on it at center stage associated with the most famous generals on the union side in the final act of the civil war. if the civil war were was depicted the opera they would have been on stage in the chorus at every point. you mentioned ken burns, which brings to the third strand of the book, which is the complaint, if you like, the criticism of the cause myth anthology. there are two characters who play a big part in the book. one is william archibald dunning, whom you call a lion of manhattan society. and another was walter fleming. can tell us about those two guys. i can. these are the architects of the lost mythology. and it's so fitting that we're here in new jersey. we'll turn to dunning first. william archibald dunning was born in plainfield, new jersey. he went to princeton, kicked out. he went to columbia, got his p

american politics, if i want to say a few specific sentences, for example, the new york times , in its editorial entitled "violence infects and affects american political life ," wrote that biden said in his own statements, "we are not such a nation, but is this the case with many reactions , the level of violence ?" pervasive in american history they ignore the foreign policy written in a similar way that the americans have seen the ugly dimensions of these actions many times before and now they act as if these actions are not normal in their country, but it is normal . that the media say what you think. the successful assassination of john f. kennedy, as well as the assassination of john f. kennedy's brother, whose brother is now trying for the presidency of the united states, and he may also be the target of these political assassinations , so there is a long history of assassinations in political assassinations in the united states, as far as the new york times. he writes: it is not true that america is actually not on the right path . there are many historical documents that show

"new york times" had me behind before and didn't have anything to do with this race. behind 10 points. 10 points, they had me behind. nothing's changed substantially since the debate in "the new york times" poll. >> george: when you look at the reality though, mr. president, i mean -- you won the popular vote in 2020. but it was still deadly close in the electoral college -- >> 7 million votes. >> george: yes, but you're behind now in the popular vote. >> i don't -- i don't buy that. >> george: is it worth the risk? >> i don't think anybody's more qualified to be president or win this race than me. >> george: you know, the heart of your case against donald trump is that he's only out for himself. putting his personal interests ahead of the national interest. how do you respond to critics who say that by staying in the race, you're doing the same thing? >> oh, come on. i don't think those critics know what they're talking about. >> george: they're just wrong? >> they're just wrong. look. trump is a pathological liar. trump is -- he is -- you ever seen anything trump did

and "new york times" bestseller. [ laughter ] >> kumail: yeah. >> it was kind of crazy. ey said, "at 6:00 tonight, it will go live on the website, but you have to keep it quiet." >> kumail: who tells you? the statue of liberty calls you? [ laughter ] >> yes, statue of liberty calls me up, weird voice. "hi, it's me, i've got to be quick. i've got to hold up the torch again. anyway." they tell me. i'm alone in the hotel room, i'm on tour with the book. i figured, i'll announce it to the crowd. i'm doing this big event in chicago. i'm going to tell the crowd, so it's going to be really good. i go out on stage. i've got this little secret. oh, i've got to have somebody tape it. i don't know anyone there. i take out my phone, "sir, can you hold this for a second? hit record. it will all make sense in a second." >> kumail: random guy in the audience. >> nice guy. i looked in the audience and picked somebody, "yeah, you can do it." he looked like he could hold a camera. [ laughter ] >> kumail: that bar so is low. >> very low. i gave to it him. "recording?" "yes." then i kind of

time to put trump in the bull's eye, which is easier said than done. when stories about biden's age and calls for him to step down are all over the news, especially "the new yorkain stepped on biden to step aside and urged the democratic leadership to publicly demand he leave the race. important to note here that "the new york times" has never called on trump to step aside or for his resignation, not when his administration was tearing migrant babies from their mother's arms or when he suggested people inject bleach into their bodies to combat a raging pandemic or when he incited a violent insurrection with the goal of overturning an election so he could just stay in office forever. it also comes as yesterday the times published a story not from the editorial side but from the news side about dr. kevin canard, an expert on parkinson's disease who visited the white house eight times over the course of eight months. the reporting does not however elaborate on why he was at the white house or if the president was even there when he visited. which according to nbc news, most of the time, he wasn't. bides was only at the white house for a few of those dates. for mo

the new york times reporting of the way the press secretary handle that was to say that she dodged the questions. that is not true. the new york times is wrong about that. she responded to everyone of the questions. she didn't answer the questions with the name that they were asking for of a particular doctor. she didn't get the answer the new york times wanted or other reporters wanted but she did, in fact, answer every single time the reporters kept banging on about a new york times report today that indicated that a neurologist had visited the white house eight times in the last year. here is the full explanation of how that has nothing to do with president biden and president biden's health and the kind of out-of-control behavior of by the white house, most of the white house press corps. not all, most of the white house press corps today was as bad a circus as it looks like. the president's physician, kevin o'connor, has publicly released a memo that is directed to karine jean-pierre, basically in response for what she had to go through today and the white house press briefing. it

i had, has called on her, including counts about to consult the new york times because live dial 2 for the us marine cool intelligence of the got read, this got 5. so actually taking the time and joining us here today. so what's your reaction to the revelation made by this gentleman medic in the new york times optical? well, 1st of all, let's be clear that when we call these american lead units, these aren't americans. i mean, they may possess us citizenship, but they're not there in an official capacity. and they certainly don't represent the armed forces of the united states of america, all of whom are trained in the law of war, all of whom understand the duties and responsibilities of professional soldiers during time of conflict to take prisoners and treat prisoners in the course of the geneva convention, when that time comes, these are mercenaries. these are the lowest of the low. these are adventures looking for the thrill of combat. these are men who long since have lost. whatever humanity existed in them, they chill russian prisoners as if it's sport. and hopefully, one day jus

aaron, something else i wanted to touch on was reporting from the new york times saying israel's top as in mpowerfor the time being. and of course we know that would be at odds with the thinking of prime minister benjamin netanyahu. where do you think that could potentially leave him? i mean, i think the israeli military here plays a critically important role in providing the pressure point. i think once israeli, large ground manoeuvres in rafah and operations subside, which should happen in the next couple of weeks, i think there may actually be space to think seriously about a limited agreement between israel and hamas. the pressure on hamas is considerable from countries, i think, and i'm absolutely persuaded that this government in israel, no matter how right—wing and extreme it is would in fact agree to a phase i agreement. the biden administration, given the precariousness of both these fronts, i think would only be too happy to sign on. the logic being that if you could get six weeks of an actual true ceasefire, literally no israeli or hamas military activity, which is somethin

to say the "new york times" just reported the president's lapses have recently become more frequent andore worrisome and his debate prep was actually supposed to be two days longer but was cut short for rest. each day didn't begin before 11:00 and included an afternoon nap. and axios reports that white house staffers are even melting down because they're getting no explanation to quell their own concerns about biden's mental fitness. and senior leadership is operating as business is as usual. the white house chief of staff might address that tomorrow in an all-staff call. >> we're just getting started here, man. i'm confident we're going to get this done. >> the president reading from a teleprompter as elected democrats the only voices he reportedly values start to break. congressman lloyd doggett the first to announce president biden's first commitment has always been to our country not himself. i'm hopeful he will make the painful and difficult decision to withdraw. others toeing the line. >> obviously there is concern about this situation. >> jerry golden resigned to what he sees as

defending israel's transgressions uh of course of international law so just like the bbc the new york times which is a giant you know american daily um it's facing criticism for its coverage its headline about an israeli attack a school in gaza the new york times used a passive voice without specifying who carried out the attack, yeah, we have seen this uh consistently over the years, not just since 7 october, so in contrast, the news article detailing russia's assault a children's hospital in ukraine explicitly attributed the attack to russia, and employed emotionally charged language, including the term deadly, yeah, however, the nyt updated its headline on the gaza attack in response to the reaction, this time using the... phrase israeli attack in its headline, which is a first, well not a first, but it's rare, it's rare to even attribute the strike to anyone. also, the nyt in a recent article that was published after the israeli massacre on the gaza school compound during the first week of july, published a piece by raja abdul rahim and thomas fuller, which was called carnage at gaza sc

the american newspaper new york times writes about this.were expelled from the area east of paris alone. they were promised. this statement is a mess, but this is france , the president of the international olympic committee categorically disagrees. i've been here for a week now, everywhere you go there's a green light, the preparations are going very well. glavomok, of course, moves around paris without problems, along dedicated lines. previously, they could be used by city transport and the same cyclists, now for travel along the olympia. france has not yet fulfilled his promise to swim in the seine. emmanuel macron's press service explained that he never said that this would happen before the start of the games. on saturday, a rehearsal for the opening ceremony took place on the river. there are also many doubts here. organizers complain about the unexpectedly fast flow. but the main headache is security. for her sake, the number of spectators has been halved. soldiers practice defense against knife attacks during training exercises atta

defending israel's transgressions, of course of international law, so just like the bbc, the new york times, which is a giant, american daily ' it's facing criticism for its coverage, its headline about an israeli attack a school in gaza, the new york times used a passive voice without specifying who carried out the attack, yeah we have seen this uh consistently over the years, not just since 7 october, so in contrast, the news article detailing russia's assault a children's hospital in ukraine explicitly attributed the attack to russia and employed emotionally charged language, including the term deadly, yeah. however, the nyt updated its headline on the gaza attack in response to the reaction, this time using the phrase israeli attack in its headline, which is a first, well not a first, but it's rare, it's rare to even you know attribute the strike to anyone, also the nyt in a recent article that was published after the israeli massacre on the gaza school compound during the first week of july, published a piece by raja abdul rahim and thomas fuller. which was called carnage at gaza schoo

i wrote a piece about it in the new york times by left critics. i guess you could call that. well, it's more like a mob now who pounced on my book saying that it was erased native americans. it was book about the making of the atom bomb. i had not erased native americans from this book. but what started as a book that had gotten star reviews and was predicted for caldecott said quickly became a book that was like kryptonite and that no one, no one wanted to touch it and. it kind of got disappeared. i also had an avid contracts canceled very much when they were canceled. they weren't they weren't news items. this wasn't that was written about in the news. it happened behind the scenes books that two contracts were canceled because my identity did not match the identity of the subject matter. one was a book on contract for, a book on ruth bader ginsburg that the publisher felt that because another book was coming out on this topic by, a jewish woman. my book could not compete with that. in the other instance, there was a book i had written about a white well, a slave owner. our

and just the last 24 hours, this is important, listen to this, "the new york times" reporting that, "r democratic donors are devising plans to pressure biden to step aside, the donors, the money dries up, that is big pier at the times cnn also reporting the president told democratic governors that he needed more sleep and that he no longer schedule events after 8:00 p.m. he read what a display of confidence, that is what he told the governors he was supposed to reassure and then biden gave this tumbling and we will play it for you when full, 90-seconds be at the white house fourth of july event and this is it in its entirety. >> hey, folks might just found out that if i go a round with him, i can come back and shake hands and do whatever they wanted to hear they were 70,000 people waiting at the gate to get in here and so if i don't finish this, they can't come in. maybe if you are hanging around, i will sneak back out if that is okay. thank you, thank you, thank you. remember that famous expression, they only serve for those who stand and wait. i remember when my son was deployed, my